{"id":402,"date":"2010-12-17T06:31:14","date_gmt":"2010-12-17T11:31:14","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blog.musoscribe.com\/?p=402"},"modified":"2010-12-17T06:31:14","modified_gmt":"2010-12-17T11:31:14","slug":"book-review-the-beatles-vs-the-rolling-stones","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blog.musoscribe.com\/index.php\/2010\/12\/17\/book-review-the-beatles-vs-the-rolling-stones\/","title":{"rendered":"Book Review: The Beatles vs. the Rolling Stones"},"content":{"rendered":"

The Beatles vs. the Rolling Stones: Sound Opinions on the Great Rock’n’Roll Rivalry<\/em>
\nby Jim DeRogatis and Greg Kot
\nVoyageur Press; 190pp. US$35.00<\/p>\n

\n

My teenage years started in the mid 70s, some seven years after the Beatles <\/strong>announced their breakup. But some remnants of the sixties mindset remained even then: you were implicitly expected to pick a team, as it were. Where and when I grew up, you were either a Beatles fan, or you liked the Rolling Stones<\/strong>. Not both.In those days, the term \u201cclassic rock\u201d had yet to enter common lexicon, and of course the Stones were still together, making music. (Oh wait: they still are? Well, that may technically be true, but in 2010 they indisputably suck.)<\/p>\n

You can guess which side of the argument I came down on. As a teen I thought of the Stones as crude, loutish, and far too reliant upon visual gimmickry (they were pretty glam in the 70s, you might recall). Their music struck me as hopelessly derivative, even then; hell, essentially a cover band, their first single was given to them by none other than Lennon <\/strong>and McCartney<\/strong>!<\/p>\n

My friend Randy was (and probably remains) a Stones fan. I suspect he found the Beatles too cuddly, contrived and nonthreatening. Plus, he could have argued, the Beatles had broken up. The Stones were still putting out great, timeless rock music like \u201cMiss You\u201d and \u201cEmotional Rescue.\u201d (Oh, wait: that evidence is more supportive of my point of view. For me the last gasp\/death rattle was 1974\u2019s It\u2019s Only Rock\u2019n\u2019Roll<\/em>.)<\/p>\n

Of course both viewpoints had some merit, and both were hopelessly shortsighted. But that\u2019s how it was.<\/p>\n

And thanks to Jim DeRogatis<\/strong> and Greg Kot<\/strong>, the old wounds have again been opened. These music scholars\u2019 good-natured back-and-forth about the relative merits of the two groups \u2013 the \u201cGreat Rock\u2019n\u2019Roll Rivalry\u201d as they might (and do) say \u2013 form the basis of the new book The Beatles vs. the Rolling Stones<\/em>.<\/p>\n

DeRogatis is the former pop music critic for the Chicago Sun-Times<\/em>, author of several well-regarded and highly readable books on rock music. Kot was (and remains) Jim\u2019s counterpart at the Chicago Tribune<\/em>. Together the duo has hosted a weekly radio program called Sound Opinions<\/em>. Put simply, these guys know their stuff, and they convey that knowledge in a user-friendly manner.<\/p>\n

The book is structured in a clever way. Consisting essentially of the edited transcripts of a friendly Kot-DeRogatis argument, the book is divide into chapters that examine the rivalry from a number of angles, through a variety of lenses. Who was the better drummer: Charlie Watts<\/strong> or Ringo Starr<\/strong>? Who wrote better songs: the Glimmer Twins or John and Paul? Which was the greater double LP set: Exile on Main Street<\/em> or The Beatles<\/em>? As a reader, you may not always agree with the answer to each. In fact, the authors themselves<\/em> often don\u2019t agree. Sometimes they both come down on one side, sometimes they\u2019re at adamant loggerheads, and occasionally they call a draw. But good cases are always made.<\/p>\n

If The Beatles vs. the Rolling Stones<\/em> were simply that \u2013 the conversation between these two writers \u2013 it would be worth reading for fans of either group. But the book itself is really something special. On my bookshelf I have literally dozens of Beatles-related books (many of which are commented upon in this <\/em>book, as it turns out), and yet there are scores of photos in the Kot-DeRogatis book that I\u2019ve never seen before. The book is beautifully laid out; it\u2019s essentially a coffee-table tome that happens to have lots of informative, entertaining text as well. The cover sports one of those groovy two-in-one photo deals (like on old 3-D baseball cards) that displays either the Beatles or the Stones, depending on one\u2019s viewing angle.<\/p>\n

The Beatles vs. the Rolling Stones<\/em> makes a great gift idea, but for fans of the Beatles, the Stones and\/or excellent, well-informed rock criticism and history, you might want to dispense with the whole gift concept and just pick it up for yourself.<\/p>\n

Follow \u201cthe_musoscribe\u201d on Twitter<\/a> and get notified
\nwhen new features, reviews and essays are published.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

DISCLOSURE OF MATERIAL CONNECTION:
\n\"I<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The Beatles vs. the Rolling Stones: Sound Opinions on the Great Rock’n’Roll Rivalry by Jim DeRogatis and Greg Kot Voyageur Press; 190pp. US$35.00 My teenage years started in the mid […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_exactmetrics_skip_tracking":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[10,65],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-402","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-book","category-review","cat-10-id","cat-65-id"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.musoscribe.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/402","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.musoscribe.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.musoscribe.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.musoscribe.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.musoscribe.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=402"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blog.musoscribe.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/402\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.musoscribe.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=402"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.musoscribe.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=402"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.musoscribe.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=402"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}