{"id":853,"date":"2012-08-16T05:25:39","date_gmt":"2012-08-16T10:25:39","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blog.musoscribe.com\/?p=853"},"modified":"2026-08-20T16:09:33","modified_gmt":"2026-08-20T20:09:33","slug":"album-review-yes-open-your-eyes-vinyl-reissue","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/blog.musoscribe.com\/index.php\/2012\/08\/16\/album-review-yes-open-your-eyes-vinyl-reissue\/","title":{"rendered":"Album Review: Yes &#8211; Open Your Eyes (vinyl reissue)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/musoscribe.com\/images\/yes_open_your_eyes.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"280\" height=\"280\" align=\"right\" hspace=\"10\" vspace=\"10\" \/>For some bands, personnel changes are the mile markers by which we chart their history. Members come and go, and (usually) each time, the character of the group changes in some measurable way. For whatever reason or reasons, progressive rock bands seem to engender the most frequent lineup changes; are prog players more difficult to get along with than others?<\/p>\n<p>Recently I&#8217;ve engaged in a few lively debates with fellow music journalists (plus a number of just plain music fans) on the topic of what is or isn&#8217;t the \u201creal\u201d [insert name of band here]. The initial impetus for the discussion centered around my purchase of tickets to see <strong>The Who<\/strong> this coming fall, a tour during which they&#8217;ll perform <em>Quadrophenia<\/em> in its entirety. The \u201cthey\u201d this time around includes <strong>Pete Townshend<\/strong> (aka the guy who wrote the songs), <strong>Roger Daltrey<\/strong> (aka the guy who sings most of &#8217;em), but of course does not include the Who rhythm section of J<strong>ohn Entwistle<\/strong> and <strong>Keith Moon<\/strong>, both deceased. My own argument \u2013 in that case at least, is that it&#8217;s The Who as long as Pete and Roger say it is.<\/p>\n<p>Others clearly disagree. Which brings me to the knottier case of <a href=\"http:\/\/blog.musoscribe.com\/?p=675\"><strong>Yes<\/strong><\/a>. Few other bands have seen members come and go (and come and go <em>again<\/em>) as often as has this British progressive group. Only bassist <a href=\"http:\/\/blog.musoscribe.com\/?p=550\"><strong>Chris Squire<\/strong><\/a> has been in every incarnation of the band since its formation in 1969, and while Squire may or may not be the <em>de facto<\/em> leader, he&#8217;s no autocratic man-with-the-inflexible-vision such as another prog group has (I&#8217;m not mentioning names; last time I did, said guitarist complained about me on his blog.)<\/p>\n<p>The thing is, the Yes \u201csound\u201d has gone through a number of changes in the band&#8217;s lengthy and convoluted career, and those changes haven&#8217;t always corresponded to the arrival or departure of the musicians one might expect. When ace keyboardist <a href=\"http:\/\/blog.musoscribe.com\/?p=686\"><strong>Rick Wakeman<\/strong><\/a> left (the first of, like, three times), his replacement <strong>Patrick Moraz<\/strong> arguably didn&#8217;t change the band&#8217;s sound all that much. And when <strong>Jon Anderson<\/strong> jumped (or was pushed; accounts vary), his replacements \u2013 <strong>Trevor Horn<\/strong> in the 80s, <strong>Beno\u00eet David<\/strong>, and now a <strong>Jon Davison<\/strong> \u2013 traded in a very similar vocal style.<\/p>\n<p>No, the biggest sonic change with regard to the Yes sound came when <strong>Steve Howe<\/strong> exited the group, to be replaced (so to speak) by South African guitarist <strong>Trevor Rabin<\/strong>. When Rabin came on board, the band&#8217;s commercial fortunes were raised; thus began the <em>90125<\/em> era. But that version of the band often sounded very little like \u201cclassic\u201d Yes; in places (such as the smash single \u201cOwner of a Lonely Heart\u201d) they sounded instead like a cross between <strong>The Art of Noise<\/strong> and <strong>The Police<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p>The band&#8217;s history got <em>really<\/em> complicated in the 90s. At one point there were essentially two Yes bands, and when they made up, the result was the <em>Union<\/em> era, a product that some found great, others gruesome. Toward the end of that whole era came the 1997 album <em>Open Your Eyes<\/em>. What&#8217;s especially odd about this record (re-released in 2012 as a double vinyl LP in a gatefold sleeve) is that while it features four of the \u201ccore\u201d members (Anderson, Squire, Howe and <strong>Alan White<\/strong>) plus multi-instrumentalist <a href=\"http:\/\/blog.musoscribe.com\/?p=610\"><strong>Billy Sherwood<\/strong><\/a>, musically it&#8217;s more of a piece with the Rabin era. Howe conceded as much in an interview with <strong>Chris Welch<\/strong>; as quoted in <em>Close to the Edge: The Story of Yes<\/em>, Howe admitted, \u201c[T]he tracks on <em>Open Your Eyes<\/em> were basically initiated and put together by Chris [Squire] and Billy [Sherwood]. It&#8217;s not really Yes music. We had to grin and bear it and add a few bits and pieces.\u201d Whether it&#8217;s completely accurate or a polite (and intra-band political) fiction, all tracks on <em>Open Your Eyes<\/em> are credited to all five members of Yes.<\/p>\n<p>That shouldn&#8217;t be construed to suggest that <em>Open Your Eyes<\/em> doesn&#8217;t have some good music. While the opening track \u201cNew State of Mind\u201d sounds like a <em>Big Generator<\/em> outtake, the title track displays the trademark Yes balance of high-flying, muscular music. And the vocals on <em>Open Your Eyes<\/em> support an argument I&#8217;ve long made: that particular vocal sound that we&#8217;ve come to think of as \u201cthe Yes vocal sound\u201d is every bit as much Chris Squire as Jon Anderson. This explains why non-Anderson albums such as <em>Drama<\/em> (1980) and <em>Fly From Here<\/em> (2011) still have that classic Yes feel. But on <em>Open Your Eyes<\/em><span style=\"font-style: normal;\">,<\/span> Squire&#8217;s vocals are pushed just a bit more forward in the mix.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cUniversal Garden\u201d features Howe&#8217;s expressive Spanish guitar, but in the end the song feels like two separate song fragments that don&#8217;t quite fit together. The lyrics of \u201cNo Way We Can Lose\u201d display that curious hippie ethos unique to Yes; it sounds like a rock arrangement of a song they might have sung around the campfire at a Yes summer camp. \u201cFortune Seller\u201d has the feel of <em>90125<\/em>-era Yes, and again sports some musical ideas that \u2013 each taken on their own \u2013 are compelling, but together don&#8217;t seem to blend. \u201cMan in the Moon\u201d is a catchy number, but alas, it&#8217;s the sort of track some would hold up to prove that the music on <em>Open Your Eyes<\/em> doesn&#8217;t sound like classic Yes. In particular, the track&#8217;s lack of interesting keyboard flourishes is emblematic of the musical approach throughout the album.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWonderlove\u201d has flashes of that classic sound, but they&#8217;re shot through with a plucky rhythm guitar part that explicitly recalls \u201cOwner of a Lonely Heart.\u201d The brief \u201cFrom the Balcony\u201d is acoustic-based but doesn&#8217;t sound a whole lot like Howe, even though the guitarist is dizzyingly versatile and adept at any number of styles; it&#8217;s just that this song sounds like none of those. (Maybe it&#8217;s Sherwood.) \u201cLove Shine\u201d is one of the catchiest, successful tracks on <em>Open Your Eyes<\/em>. No lightning bass runs from Squire, and still leaning in the direction of \u201cmodern\u201d Yes, but it&#8217;s still a pleasantly memorable track. \u201cSomehow&#8230;..Someday\u201d (why <em>five<\/em> dots in the ellipsis? I dunno) is pleasant enough, but musically seems to cover the same ground as most of the previous cuts. A few melodic lines within do vaguely recall <em>Close to the Edge<\/em>, however.<\/p>\n<p>The entirety of Side Four of the 2012 vinyl reissue of <em>Open Your Eyes<\/em> is (theoretically) taken up with \u201cThe Solution,\u201d a 24-minute piece. But it&#8217;s a curious concoction, even by Yes standards. The basic song runs a few minutes, and is a slight cut above most of the other <em>Open Your Eyes<\/em> tracks. But the number fades out at its end, followed by a long stretch of silence. Then some ambient noises \u2013 tweeting birds, waves crashing on a faraway shore, etc. \u2013 come in, punctuated ever thirty seconds or so by <em>a cappella<\/em> snatches of other tracks from the album. Interesting, to be sure, but not the sort of thing one listens to with any regularity. Overall it has the feel of a \u201cYes vocal remix\u201d novelty track. It sounds as if someone got access to all the master tapes from the <em>Open Your Eyes<\/em> sessions and decided to have a bit of post-production fun with them. One suspects that the process of assembling the cut was more fun that sitting through a playback of it, however.<\/p>\n<p>Packaging on the new vinyl reissue is exquisite: the thick vinyl and heavy stock paper gatefold sleeve help make the whole affair feel very substantial; the stark graphics \u2013 a giant Yes logo set against a black background \u2013 unsubtly put across the point that this <em>really truly&#8230;no, <strong>really truly<\/strong>..is<\/em> a Yes album. Not a single band photo is included, but the inside of the gatefold does include all the lyrics. In total, <em>Open Your Eyes<\/em> doesn&#8217;t rank among the top half-dozen Yes albums, but neither is it a total disaster. It&#8217;s worth hearing for anyone who enjoys the band, but new listeners are advised against expecting to wander in and finding some heretofore undiscovered gem.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>For some bands, personnel changes are the mile markers by which we chart their history. Members come and go, and (usually) each time, the character of the group changes in [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_exactmetrics_skip_tracking":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[65,73],"tags":[2413],"class_list":["post-853","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-review","category-vinyl","tag-yes","cat-65-id","cat-73-id"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/blog.musoscribe.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/853","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/blog.musoscribe.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/blog.musoscribe.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blog.musoscribe.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blog.musoscribe.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=853"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"http:\/\/blog.musoscribe.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/853\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":32259,"href":"http:\/\/blog.musoscribe.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/853\/revisions\/32259"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/blog.musoscribe.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=853"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blog.musoscribe.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=853"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blog.musoscribe.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=853"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}